The system can be constrained to a hyperplane
in phase space in a molecular simulation, by extending the Lagrangian
with a term
, with
the atomic positions, our reaction coordinate, and the
Lagrange multiplier associated with the force on the holonomic constraint.
Each atom then feels a constraint force, equal to
.
It is well known that the use of constraints affects the phase space
distribution (see e.g. ref frenkel_smit).
For a velocity-independent property , the bias introduced by a
constraint can be compensated using the relation
where the factor is defined by
(52) |
This was generalized recently for velocity dependent properties, such as the the mean force of constraint[17,76]. In the formulation of reference otterw3 it reads:
where is the temperature, is Boltzmann's constant, and is the mass of particle .
The second term in the numerator of equation 3.7 arises because the mean force of constraint depends on the velocities, through the kinetic term in the force of constraint (equation 1). In their work, they demonstrated the importance of the corrections for a constrained bending angle of a tri-atomic molecule and for a constrained dihedral angle in a tetra atomic molecule.
In table 3.8, we show the results for the mean force of constraint for our S2 reaction using the constraint of equation 2, once as , once corrected according to equation 3.5 and once using equation 3.7. As the differences are very small, the bias on our system introduced by the constraint must by very small.
|
||||
|
||||
0.27 | -0.0091 | -0.0098 | -0.0095 | |
|
||||
0.32 | -0.0494 | -0.0498 | -0.0496 | |
|
||||
0.35 | -0.0815 | -0.0831 | -0.0830 | |
|
||||
0.40 | -0.2384 | -0.2396 | -0.2394 | |
|
||||
0.43 | -0.3268 | -0.3277 | -0.3276 | |
|
||||
0.45 | -0.2929 | -0.2931 | -0.2930 | |
|
||||
0.50 | -0.0408 | -0.0408 | -0.0408 | |
|
||||
0.55 | 0.2570 | 0.2572 | 0.2571 | |
|
||||
0.60 | 0.1955 | 0.1966 | 0.1964 | |
|
||||
0.70 | 0.0018 | 0.0004 | 0.0002 |